Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa

Cross-posted from votehope2008.org

For too many years, those of us who live outside of small states like Iowa and New Hampshire have not had much of a say in the important process of determining the Democratic Party nominee for president.

But that's all going to change in 2008. With California's primary now set for Feb. 5, the Golden State will actually be among the first to cast votes - in vote-by-mail ballots that will hit mailboxes as soon as the first week in January.

A new independent grass-roots effort supporting Barack Obama, called Vote Hope, will be capitalizing on that fact by running a field campaign to bank 500,000 early votes for Obama in California. This represents more Democrats than voted total in the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries in 2004.

Vote Hope, which officially launches today, is led by a network of activists for social justice in California who want to ensure that the voices of diverse Californians are heard during this critical part of the democratic process.

We are inspired by Barack Obama's life experience, his vision for the country, and his calls for people to self-organize in a new wave of political participation. We are heeding that call and building something ourselves that will be value-added in California -- starting now.

Our strategy: Bank it for Barack

Vote Hope will work over the next seven months to identify 500,000 Barack Obama supporters - online and in communities, through traditional organizing and non-traditional cultural events - who will vote early for Obama, either by mail or at the county registrar's office. Early voting in California will begin Jan. 7, and we will be running a sophisticated, voter-file-driven program to turn out our early votes before the Iowa caucuses even begin.

We know that Barack Obama has deep support in California, much of it from ordinary people in constituencies that have been all but ignored by every major campaign in recent memory, particularly young people and in communities of color. There are millions of people in California who are registered but don't vote regularly, and millions more who are eligible to be registered. We're going to engage them, empower them with tools and data, and we're going to win California for Barack Obama.

And our work won't end at 8 p.m. on February 5, 2008, when the polls close and the early vote by mail results show a beaming Barack Obama sweeping California. We're building for the long term from the ground up, and we want you to get involved.

Why Obama?

Why Obama? In a word: experience. Obama's life and political experience - as a Black man in an America still struggling with racism, as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago who then became a Senator - represents an economic, social and cultural experience unlike any of the other presidential contenders, and unlike anyone who has ever lived in the White House.

Many people may not know what it means to be a community organizer. This kind of work requires self-sacrifice, perseverance, and equal amounts of unwavering idealism and a willingness to confront the cold hard facts of any given situation. It requires coming down from your own perspective, analysis and ideas, and getting very close to the core of what motivates people - and what doesn't. Making these judgments is at the heart of effective politics. It's the kind of experience that reflects the priorities we want to see tackled in this country - the priorities of those people struggling at the margins and outside of the current power structure.

That, combined with his eight years in the Illinois State Senate and four years in the U.S. Senate, has given Obama a very clear understanding of how government really works, inside and out.

We've become accustomed to politicians who use differences of faith, gender, and class to separate the American people. We stand behind Obama because he has established a career and a campaign that leverages the power of our diversity to bring us closer together -- that critical first step in moving us forward as a nation. The next several years of cleaning up the messes that the Bush Administration and Republican Congress have made are going to be incredibly difficult. The work we have to do is going to be impossible without a united country behind the leadership.

We believe Barack Obama's experience also makes him the best candidate to restore and repair the image of the U.S. in the world. New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman agreed, in a recent piece titled "Help Wanted":

I think Mr. Obama has the potential to force a new discussion. For now at least, he has a certain moral authority because of his life story, which makes him harder to dismiss. And while he is a good talker, he strikes me as an even better listener. It's amazing what people will let you say to them, if you just listen to them first.

We are standing on the edge of an incredible opportunity in America. Vote Hope is here to ensure that Californians can be actively involved in seizing it.

Obama gives us hope. It's our job to deliver the vote. Are you in?



Display:


Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

California voters still will not have much say in the process.

The TV staions that run ads and the 15 second news segments detailing horserace numbers from the campaign are who will have the say.

This is why I've come to appreciate IA and NH's role in the process. It's the only way to bypass the Big Media/Big Money process that stifles debate and forces candidates to run TV-centric campaigns.


by adamterando on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 07:52:11 PM EST

Friedman unit (none / 0)

Tom Friedman? The guy for which the Friedman Unit of Six More Months in Iraq to "tell" if it's working.  Tom Friedman wouldn't know moral authority if it bit him on his billionaire behind.


by MassEyesandEars on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 07:55:33 PM EST

Re: Friedman unit (none / 0)

The point is that even Tom "Friedman Unit" Friedman can smell what Obama's cooking. I helped edit this post and my apologies; I suppose that wasn't as clear as it could have been.


by Dan Ancona on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 08:03:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

Right, which is precisely why we are putting our emphasis on real field organizing! It's going to be a long process, but this is definitely a step in the right direction.

We are not willing to just let the TV stations decide. We're taking initiative to make sure we have a campaign that does go out and talk to people.


by Jenifer Fernandez Ancona on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 07:56:55 PM EST

if no one campaigns in Florida (none / 0)

when they count the ballots do they make a sound?


Obama! because 51% isn't enough!
by nevadadem on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 08:40:31 PM EST

Re: if no one campaigns in Florida (none / 0)

Edwards has been there a number of times.


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 11:29:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

One question..I'm not trying to sound cynical here, but who watches and get in contact with those thousands of absentia ballots?...I would think that one member of every team would pay close attention to where those ballots gets stored and who gets in contact with them.

Anyway, good looking out for Obama..Being the first to start something like that is good...He should run hard with it.


by JaeHood on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 10:23:50 PM EST

Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

I applaud Obama for this effort. However, I believe IA and NH will be moving up their Caucus and primary daTES.


by BDM on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 10:48:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

thanks to florida....


"I want my voice to be read"
by icebergslim on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 01:25:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yet another pro-Obama (none / 0)

post devoid of policy, politics, and ideology.

Empty, in other words.


by david mizner on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 10:33:47 AM EST

Re: Yet another pro-Obama (none / 0)

Absolutely,  this is all about low information voters and appealing to their home team instincts. this is not about choosing the best person for the position.  Talk about a cynical approach to politics.  

Obama can't seem to convince people up close in Iowa.  The closer I look the more the Chicago style politics is showing up.  I guess it is new politics on the national scene.

I thought college students would be smarter than this.  Maybe many of them will be.


I am an Edwards Democrat. Visit EENR blog for Progressives
by pioneer111 on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 11:47:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Gaming the calendar, al a Lieberman (none / 0)

To me, this sounds an awful lot like how Lieberman gamed the election calendar in Connecticut during the primary.

Of course, Lieberman was Obama's mentor in the Senate, so it isn't too surprising.


by aldon on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 11:06:53 AM EST

Re: Vote Hope's California Challenge: Beat Iowa (none / 0)

This is a great idea and all the campaigns should have their own operations (or third party allies doing it for them) going in the states that have early voting going on before Iowa and NH will announce their results. It seems that Obama would certainly have the resources to bank roll this sort of effort and it's likely that Hillary and Edwards could bank roll it through their campaigns or by having their big donors who are tapped out donate to the appropiate entity to conduct the field operation for them.

I do think the early voting will end up having a lot less impact if people actively choose to wait to vote until after Iowa and NH (and perhaps the other early states as well) announce their results or if (as is likely) Iowa and NH move up their caucus and primary even earlier.


by Quinton on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 06:47:52 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.